Strong perceived value of design with 70.2% feel valued in their organizations (ratings 5-7)
Mixed user focus decision making with 57.7% believe their organisations prioritise user needs
Ongoing education needed for 69.2% had to invest extra effort in design advocacy
Takeaways
While designers feel valued, significant effort is still required to educate and advocate for design's importance.
Organisations show growing recognition of user needs, but the practice at work remains inconsistent.
The gap between role value (70.2% positive) and fair compensation (51.4% positive) suggests thereโs an opportunity to bridge the two.
Design maturity varies significantly across organisations, with ongoing need for cross-functional education.
Strong correlation between design advocacy efforts and perceived organisational value, suggesting the work to education is paying off.
Role Value Perception
I feel that my role is valued in my organisation
Designers generally feel valued, with 70.2% reporting positive perception (ratings 5-7) of their role's importance.
User-Centricity
I feel that my organisation genuinely priorities user needs and experiences in our decisions
Organisations show mixed commitment to user needs, with 57.7% reporting strong user focus (ratings 5-7). The data could suggest varying levels of design maturity across Southeast Asian organisations.
Fair Compensation
I am compensated fairly for my role and level
Compensation satisfaction shows room for improvement, with 51.4% feeling fairly compensated (ratings 5-7).
Design Education Efforts
I have to put in extra effort to education other cross-functional teams about design in order to do my job effectively
Design advocacy remains crucial, with 69.2% of designers (ratings 5-7) actively educating other teams.
๐๏ธย Commentary
On the topic of showing designโs value to businesses
There's an 18.8% gap between design's value and how it's rewarded, as some in the region may still see design as just making things look good rather than being strategic
Many designers (69.2%) spend a lot of energy proving design's worth, which could lead to burnout or career resignation over time
What makes "good design" means different things to different businesses - mature companies focus on getting work done rather than following frameworks
Companies may measure design success in many ways: return on investment, strategic value, customer satisfaction, and brand impact
What This Means For You
If you're a designer:
Find ways to balance showing design's value with your main work - picking your battles
Look for business numbers that show how your work makes a difference, considering investing in soft skills and peripheral knowledge
If you're leading a team:
How can you help others see design as strategic, not just visual, craft, or delivery-based work only?
Think about ways to show design's value without putting too much pressure on individual designers
If you're running an organisation:
Check if chasing "design maturity" actually helps your business goals
Consider what success looks like for design in your specific business
Questions Worth Exploring
How can Southeast Asian designers help others see design as strategic work?
Should we focus on formal frameworks or practical business needs?
Should proving design's value be someone's specific job (management, perhaps) rather than everyone's extra work?
How can companies measure design's value simply and effectively?