Digital design dominates with 61.8% in product/UX roles, while traditional design maintains 22.7% presence
Full-time employment prevails (79.3%), with growing flexible workforce (18.8% combined contractors and freelancers)
Product/UX design leads specialisations (41.7%), followed by visual/UI design (16.9%)
Career Levels
Mid-level IC forms largest segment (42.6%), with limited senior representation (5.9% in leadership)
Clear distinction between IC (94.1%) and management tracks (5.9%)
Junior IC (21.3%) and Senior IC (20.5%) show similar representation
Experience and Education
Young workforce dominates with 60% having 1-5 years design experience, yet diverse total work histories
Strong formal education background (77.5% hold bachelor's degrees) paired with self-taught skills (17.12%)
Primarily local-centric roles with limited international exposure (14.19% reporting overseas experience)
Job Titles
The word cloud analysis reveals distinct role categories and specialisations in the Southeast Asian design industry.
Key Statistics
"Designer" remains the central role designation
Product and UI/UX form primary specialisations
Creative roles maintain significant presence
Leadership titles span Lead, Manager, and Director levels
Notable
Strong digital focus in role descriptions
Traditional design roles maintain presence
Hybrid roles emerging at intersection of design and development
Employment Type
Current employment type
Traditional employment models remain dominant, with nearly 80% in full-time roles.
Key Statistics
Full-time employment: 79.30%
Fixed-term contractors: 13.75%
Self-employed/Freelancers: 5.01%
Interns/Apprentices: 1.95%
Notable
Dominant full-time employment model
Combined flexible workforce at 18.76%
Small but present early-career segment
Levelling
Level of seniority
Clear pyramid structure emerges with broad mid-level base (42.57%) and tapered leadership representation.
Key Statistics
Core workforce (94.1%):
Junior IC (Entry level): 21.26%
Mid-level IC: 42.57%
Senior IC: 20.53%
Lead/Staff/Principal IC: 9.74%
Management tiers (5.9%):
Management roles: 3.73%
Director/VP: 0.89%
Head of department/Senior leadership: 1.28%
Notable
Strong concentration in mid-level positions
Clear separation between IC and management tracks
Tapered representation at senior levels
Primary Field of Work
Primary field of work
Design specialisations show clear digital dominance, with product and UX design leading the industry landscape.
Key Statistics
Digital design (61.83%):
Product/UX design: 41.74%
Visual/UI design: 16.86%
Product/UX research: 3.23%
Traditional design (22.65%):
Marketing/graphic design: 20.65%
Motion/animation: 1.84%
Industrial design: 0.67%
Emerging specialities (8.67%):
Design leadership: 3.67%
Design operations: 1.39%
Service design: 1.39%
Front-end/design engineering: 1.06%
Notable
Digital product roles form largest segment
Traditional design maintains significant presence
Emergence of specialised operational and research roles
Years of experience
The experience distribution reveals multiple dimensions of career development in Southeast Asia's design industry, showing distinct patterns between design-specific experience and total working years.
Majority of designers have 5 years or less of relevant design experience
Total working experience skews higher, with 17.20% at 20+ years
Clear experience level bands emerge in both design and total work history
More balanced distribution across experience bands
Significant representation in senior bands
Higher retention in advanced career stages
Experience Correlation
Total working vs design years of experience
Key Statistics
68% have total experience within 2 years of design experience
Largest cluster: 3-7 years in both categories
Significant outliers: 20+ years total with <10 years design
Notable
From the density plot:
Strong diagonal alignment for early career
Increasing variance in later career stages
Clear patterns of career transition into design
Higher density in 2-5 year range for both metrics
Career Transition
The data suggests multiple career entry points:
Direct entry: Similar total and design experience
Career transitions: Higher total than design experience
Early-career clustering: Strongest in 2-5 year range
Education
The educational landscape of Southeast Asian designers reveals a complex ecosystem combining formal tertiary education with various forms of continuous learning and professional development.
Bachelor's degrees are the most common formal education level at 77.46%
Master's degrees and diplomas follow at 5.23% and 8.40% respectively
65.99% have taken self-taught or informal courses
βΉοΈ
In this analysis, formal education refers specifically to academic qualifications from universities or colleges (e.g., diplomas, degrees), while informal education encompasses self-directed learning, certifications, bootcamps, and other unstructured learning pathways.
Highest Formal Education
Highest level of formal education attained
Key Statistics
Primary qualifications:
High school/secondary: 7.85%
Diploma: 8.40%
Bachelor's degree: 77.46%
Post-graduate diploma: 0.78%
Master's degree: 5.23%
Doctoral or higher: 0.06%
Notable
Strong undergraduate concentration
Limited postgraduate pursuit
Accessible entry points through diplomas
Very selective doctoral-level qualification
Design-Related Education
Design-related education (formal/informal)
The data shows a balanced mix between formal and informal design education pathways.
Key Statistics
Have design-related education: 65.33%
No formal design training: 34.67%
Notable
Majority have some form of design education
Significant proportion of self-taught practitioners
Multiple learning pathways common
Design-Related Education Types
Design-related education types
The data shows diverse pathways for acquiring design expertise, with strong representation across both formal academic and informal learning channels.
Key Statistics
Distribution by type:
Formal academic design education: 65.57%
Online certifications: 32.99%
Bootcamps/workshops: 32.74%
In-person certified courses: 10.07%
Self-taught/informal courses: 34.01%
Notable
Lower uptake of in-person certified courses
High complementary use of multiple learning types
Β
Co-occurrence of education types (heatmap)
The co-occurrence data suggests designers actively combine multiple learning approaches, with a clear preference for flexible and accessible learning formats.
Key Statistics
Higher combinations:
Self-taught + Online certification: 17.21%
Formal education + Self-taught: 17.12%
Bootcamps + Online certification: 16.52%
Formal education + Online certification: 15.33%
Moderate combinations:
Bootcamps + Self-taught: 14.05%
Bootcamps + Formal education: 13.03%
Lower combinations:
In-person courses + Bootcamps: 3.66%
In-person courses + Formal education: 4.34%
In-person courses + Online certification: 5.62%
In-person courses + Self-taught: 6.30%
Notable
Most adopted combination using online certification and self-taught methods
Formal education frequently complemented by self-directed learning
Bootcamps show good integration with both formal and online learning
In-person courses consistently show lowest combination rates
Online and self-taught methods emerge as preferred complementary pathways
The high adoption of multiple learning pathways reflects the industry's rapid evolution and need for continuous skill development.
Overseas working experience
Overseas working experience
The data indicates primarily domestic career development with limited international exposure.
Key Statistics
International experience: 14.19%
Domestic careers: 85.81%
Notable
Predominantly local career development
One in seven designers with international exposure
ποΈΒ Commentary
In understanding where design teams stand today, we find that
For every design manager, there are 16 individual designers - this might suggests we need more design leaders
Digital design roles (like UX/UI) are nearly 3 times more common than traditional design roles, though traditional industries are adapting more slowly
Most designers (77.5%) have university degrees, especially important in places like Indonesia where companies often require them
People who switched to design from other fields bring valuable different perspectives
What This Means For You
If you're a designer:
Consider how your previous experience in other fields could make you stand out
Look for skills beyond design that could help you advance (like business or technology)
If you're leading a team:
Think about how your company views and supports design leadership
Be ready to show how design adds value to your business, especially when budgets are tight
If you're running an organisation:
Check if you're helping individual designers become managers and the potential value it could bring
Compare how you develop design leaders versus other departments like tech
Questions Worth Exploring
Why aren't we seeing more design leaders in our region?
How important are university degrees in different companies and countries?
How will budget cuts affect developing future design leaders and career pathways?